TheArcticWolf1911
Gunslinger

Joined: Sat Nov 4th, 2017
Posts: 426
Name: Cameron ... Occupation: Process Technician ... Interests: Firearms & Ammunition, Ford Rangers, electronics ...
Reputation Points: 426
|
I'd like to get some input. I'm wanting to build an AR15 for SHTF with "combat" in mind. Just a warning now, this is going to be ramble-y. Given what I want the rifle to do, I personally feel a 20" rifle is right for me, but that being said I'm willing to hear the argument for another length.
However, I'm torn between the two features and feels of my Windham AR15A4 and Project Vietnam. I'm a better shot with project Vietnam, and it's almost a pound lighter. The downside though is that there's no real option for mounting optics, unless you consider that carry handle mount an option. I don't, personally. With my A4, I have that option, but it's heavier. I would like to mount an EoTech 512 in combination with a folding rear sight. The rear and front sights would have tritium inserts.
I plan on making use of a full length quad rail, the drop in type with your standard FSB. No free-floating here. A streamlight TLR-1 would find it's way onto the rifle, maybe a vertical grip. A bayonet for sure. Something sharp on the end I believe could help persuade a would be attacker from grabbing onto the rifle, and the longer barrel puts him farther away while also allowing for more rail space if required.
The downside is that the A4 is already a pound heavier. Adding the optic, light, rail, and bayonet will obviously increase that weight. The A1 is lighter to begin with, but again, no optics, unless I mount it on the rail itself. Not sure if that would even work.
One part of me leans towards my A1. It's lighter, easier to point, and I'm a better shot with it. My A4 however is more versitle with that flat top upper, but again heavier. The A1 also has the teardrop forward assist, but that can be placed on either rifle. Hurts less to slap it with the bigger surface area.
Another feature I plan on adding is an ECHO trigger. I feel the ability to fire faster could be useful in some cases, but with the downside of potentially reduced accuracy and you obviously burn through your ammunition more quickly. Although, just because it's there doesn't mean you must use it.
I'm kind of at a stalemate with myself.
____________________ 1999 Ford Ranger XLT - 3.0 V6 4x4 - Loaded (Totaled) 143k. Rest in Peace, Gold Dust.
|