Ford-Rangers.com Ranger Forum HomeFord-Rangers.com Ranger Forum Home
Home Recent Topics New posts Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Ford-Rangers.com Ranger Forum > Ranger Engine Tech > 8 Cylinder Gasoline > Concept SVE ranger

Ford-rangers.com is a discussion forum, a Ranger forum for people who have questions about fixing or modifying
their Ford Rangers or people who just admire their Ranger. Please join and enjoy sharing experiences!

Concept SVE ranger       #: 2298
 Moderated by: Mike69, MaDMaXX,
New Topic Reply
 Rate Topic 
 Posted: Thu Dec 24th, 2020 09:04 am
PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Junglejoe
Member


Joined: Tue Jun 30th, 2020
Location: Missouri USA
Posts: 293
Name: 
Occupation: 
Interests: 
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 293
Member's Gallery
 Not sure if anyone ever seen this.. but good read! It "ALMOST" actually made it into production.

https://www.motortrend.com/news/ford-ranger-svt-v8/



____________________
2000 EFI 302 Zspec T5 swap ranger
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Dec 24th, 2020 12:03 pm
PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
410customs

Idahome


Joined: Wed May 2nd, 2018
Location: Panhandle, Idaho USA
Posts: 2165
Name: Jamie ...
Occupation: Elevator Design Worlds Tallest Buildings ...
Interests: Ranger Based Vehicles and OFFROAD ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 2165
Member's Gallery
 HAHAHAHAHA thanks for sharing, I can't get past the explorer nose on the ranger!!



____________________
I build custom RBV, specializing in drivetrain conversions, wiring, suspension and complete custom trucks
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Dec 24th, 2020 04:04 pm
PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
Scrambler82
Old Bastard !


Joined: Fri Dec 22nd, 2017
Location: California USA
Posts: 2108
Name: Grev B ...
Occupation: Quality Assurance Engineer ...
Interests: Rangers, Photography, Metal Bending ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 2108
Member's Gallery
 I too enjoyed the read, as Jeep, Ford just wanted to see how many they might sell.
Why make a prototype if you don't intend to sell them, someone must have thought it was viable at the time.
My '88 STX 4x, when converted to 5.0L was incredible, it ran so much smoother, was great to drive, mpg was around 21 most of the time, it was what I thought was the truck Ford should have made.
Too bad some of these idea didn't get to production but it is as it is.



____________________
Ltr,
2003 EDGE, Std Cab, Steppie, E4 Red, 5sp, 4x
5" SuperLift, 33" x 12.50 x 15"
Hurst Shifter
Mod'd Backrack to fit Steppie
Front and Rear Bumpers by Custom 4x4 Fabrication, OK; now Mike's Welding and Fabrication.
Working on more Mods, just need more time, longer days would work !
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Dec 24th, 2020 08:56 pm
PM Quote Reply
4th Post
Junglejoe
Member


Joined: Tue Jun 30th, 2020
Location: Missouri USA
Posts: 293
Name: 
Occupation: 
Interests: 
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 293
Member's Gallery
 Looks like we built what ford should have..☕



____________________
2000 EFI 302 Zspec T5 swap ranger
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Dec 25th, 2020 12:20 pm
PM Quote Reply
5th Post
JAMMAN

Owns A Torsen


Joined: Mon Sep 18th, 2017
Location: Grove City, Ohio USA
Posts: 6429
Name: Jim ...
Occupation: 5 axis cnc programmer ...
Interests: RBV's ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 6429
Member's Gallery
 Junglejoe wrote:
Looks like we built what ford should have..☕
Yup. And will continue to until the last rust flake falls from the last standing 2011.



____________________
00 XLT 4WD RCSB 3.GO! Jalapeño
01 XLT 2WD RC Steppie 3.0 auto Silver
The future belongs to those who show up.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Jun 27th, 2021 11:46 pm
PM Quote Reply
6th Post
StoneColdStevesRanger
Mopar Guy in a Ford World


Joined: Sun Jun 27th, 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 1
Name: Self Employed ...
Occupation: 
Interests: 
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 1
Member's Gallery
 interesting that they used a tr3550 for it and a base run of 15.1 at 94 tells us the suspension could use some love to hook up. Hate the explorer front end



____________________
More Mopars than I can list
And a Ranger
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Jun 28th, 2021 11:37 pm
PM Quote Reply
7th Post
JAMMAN

Owns A Torsen


Joined: Mon Sep 18th, 2017
Location: Grove City, Ohio USA
Posts: 6429
Name: Jim ...
Occupation: 5 axis cnc programmer ...
Interests: RBV's ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 6429
Member's Gallery
 StoneColdStevesRanger wrote:
Hate the explorer front end
I've seen people do this, in the name of modification it is cool but not exactly aesthetically pleasing.

Welcome to FR



____________________
00 XLT 4WD RCSB 3.GO! Jalapeño
01 XLT 2WD RC Steppie 3.0 auto Silver
The future belongs to those who show up.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Jul 18th, 2021 07:15 pm
PM Quote Reply
8th Post
12° North Industries
SITE SPONSOR


Joined: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA
Posts: 389
Name: 
Occupation: Vehicle Upfitter ...
Interests: The great outdoors, nature, back to basics ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 389
Member's Gallery
 "This Ranger's quarter-mile best of 15.1 seconds is quick enough to surprise Z28 drivers, but it's the stout 94.1-mph trap speed that shows the midrange and top-end go-power of this none-too-aero pickup."


I think a near 270-310hp Ranger would be nice but for my likes, not in the upper RPM ranges, and I don't believe the V8 is the complete answer either.  Some form of Turbo based inline4 would be more than sufficient if not a boosted straight 6.  I dare not get into the mentioning of weight penalties because a] the 5.0 doesn't weigh but what? 27-32lbs more than the 4.0L? b] what I would do grossly outweighs that. Hypocrite isn't my color.



____________________
North Industries
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Web http://www.12degnorth.com
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri May 27th, 2022 10:32 pm
PM Quote Reply
9th Post
Junglejoe
Member


Joined: Tue Jun 30th, 2020
Location: Missouri USA
Posts: 293
Name: 
Occupation: 
Interests: 
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 293
Member's Gallery
 Yeah I'm not digging the explorer front end either..at all!



____________________
2000 EFI 302 Zspec T5 swap ranger
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri May 27th, 2022 10:34 pm
PM Quote Reply
10th Post
Junglejoe
Member


Joined: Tue Jun 30th, 2020
Location: Missouri USA
Posts: 293
Name: 
Occupation: 
Interests: 
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 293
Member's Gallery
 12° North Industries wrote:
"This Ranger's quarter-mile best of 15.1 seconds is quick enough to surprise Z28 drivers, but it's the stout 94.1-mph trap speed that shows the midrange and top-end go-power of this none-too-aero pickup."


I think a near 270-310hp Ranger would be nice but for my likes, not in the upper RPM ranges, and I don't believe the V8 is the complete answer either.  Some form of Turbo based inline4 would be more than sufficient if not a boosted straight 6.  I dare not get into the mentioning of weight penalties because a] the 5.0 doesn't weigh but what? 27-32lbs more than the 4.0L? b] what I would do grossly outweighs that. Hypocrite isn't my color.
An aluminum headed 302 is a little less weight the the 4.0 and 3.0 I believe.  At least that's what I've read



____________________
2000 EFI 302 Zspec T5 swap ranger
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon May 30th, 2022 10:22 am
PM Quote Reply
11th Post
Scrambler82
Old Bastard !


Joined: Fri Dec 22nd, 2017
Location: California USA
Posts: 2108
Name: Grev B ...
Occupation: Quality Assurance Engineer ...
Interests: Rangers, Photography, Metal Bending ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 2108
Member's Gallery
 The main reason for a V-8, other than HP, is the sound of the V-8 can not be replicates by a V-6 or 4 cyl., no matter what you do.

And there is always the adage "I should have had a V-8" still applies !



____________________
Ltr,
2003 EDGE, Std Cab, Steppie, E4 Red, 5sp, 4x
5" SuperLift, 33" x 12.50 x 15"
Hurst Shifter
Mod'd Backrack to fit Steppie
Front and Rear Bumpers by Custom 4x4 Fabrication, OK; now Mike's Welding and Fabrication.
Working on more Mods, just need more time, longer days would work !
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue May 31st, 2022 02:03 am
PM Quote Reply
12th Post
12° North Industries
SITE SPONSOR


Joined: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA
Posts: 389
Name: 
Occupation: Vehicle Upfitter ...
Interests: The great outdoors, nature, back to basics ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 389
Member's Gallery
 Scrambler82 wrote:
The main reason for a V-8, other than HP, is the sound of the V-8 can not be replicates by a V-6 or 4 cyl., no matter what you do.

And there is always the adage "I should have had a V-8" still applies !
Well, if all things were perfect, and diesel wasn't the price a gallon it is, I'd be enjoying some Cummins chatter. or Id really commit to sin itself and there would be a moderately turbo'd straight-6 which my choices and temperament of such choices ideally would sound far better and reel back a few more MPG than a V8 and all for different reasons.

Never would argue that there is very littler replacement for displacement, clearly if modding and upfit funding was equally spread across a V8, a Straight-6 Turbo, or even a 4BTA Cummins; Lets say a conservative $12-14K on engine and drive train alone.  I'd likely be fighting a slightly uphill battle in talking points.  But would champion in originality simply because a V8 just isn't my choice for whatever subconscious qualms I have.

And as far as sound?  All the 302's sound the same just about.

.



____________________
North Industries
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Web http://www.12degnorth.com
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Jun 1st, 2022 11:20 pm
PM Quote Reply
13th Post
JAMMAN

Owns A Torsen


Joined: Mon Sep 18th, 2017
Location: Grove City, Ohio USA
Posts: 6429
Name: Jim ...
Occupation: 5 axis cnc programmer ...
Interests: RBV's ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 6429
Member's Gallery
 A well tuned WRX comes close. The best sounding 4 cylinder I have ever hears. It growls not farting like a honda.



____________________
00 XLT 4WD RCSB 3.GO! Jalapeño
01 XLT 2WD RC Steppie 3.0 auto Silver
The future belongs to those who show up.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Jun 15th, 2022 01:21 pm
PM Quote Reply
14th Post
12° North Industries
SITE SPONSOR


Joined: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA
Posts: 389
Name: 
Occupation: Vehicle Upfitter ...
Interests: The great outdoors, nature, back to basics ...
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 389
Member's Gallery
  JAMMAN wrote:
A well tuned WRX comes close. The best sounding 4 cylinder I have ever hears. It growls not farting like a honda.
That's inherent to the H-motor design (Boxster engines) in comparison to an inline 4 cylinder.  Both have their problems.  ALL Subaru motors have a piston to wall clearance of 0.00 and they are inherent to wear.  And you also have to figure, most people buying Honda's for "RACECAR" purposes aren't exactly chasing high end parts, let alone often in the tax bracket to even afford so.  Most Honda guys from back in the day were sponsored by stickers of products they never bought, Ebay, and McDonalds dollar menu. So, the quality of parts usually matched that mentality and the fact they wanted to look/sound fast, but not put the money into the car to be fast or handle better.

1995 era Titanium Exhaust Header back, weighs 7.8lbs with muffler $1580 or EBAY like products not even decent quality Stainless Steel can of angry bees for $49 + shipping.  The fact I used that as an example, probably know what I used and why.  Personally I've only bought one thing ever off ebay since its existed.  Will not spend money on that site.



.



____________________
North Industries
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Web http://www.12degnorth.com
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Jun 17th, 2022 09:24 pm
PM Quote Reply
15th Post
Tsquare
Member


Joined: Fri Nov 10th, 2017
Location: Suwanee, Georgia USA
Posts: 1540
Name: 
Occupation: Controlled Insanity ...
Interests: 
Status: 
Offline
Reputation: 
Reputation Points: 1540
Member's Gallery
 12° North Industries wrote:
   And you also have to figure, most people buying Honda's for "RACECAR" purposes aren't exactly chasing high end parts, let alone often in the tax bracket to even afford so.  Most Honda guys from back in the day were sponsored by stickers of products they never bought, Ebay, and McDonalds dollar menu. So, the quality of parts usually matched that mentality and the fact they wanted to look/sound fast, but not put the money into the car to be fast or handle better.
Late 90's I had an intern with an almost new Civic  that had a custom built Acura 1.9 Turbo installed. Roughly a 230-240 HP motor. It also had the fart can exhaust. He couldn't plant the HP to the street. It sounded bad but it couldn't keep up with my wife's 96 Volvo 854. I had adjusted the blow-off on the turbo, added a less restrictive air intake, and alcohol injection post-turbo. I also has sticky tires. All the Volvo's mods were to increase fuel mileage but upped the HP from 222HP to 260ish HP. City gas mileage went from 19 to 22 And highway  from 26 to 29mpg. Unless you stuck you foot in it.



____________________
Tony
NE ATL
'04 XLT regular cab 3.slo stepside
Semi retirement
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 07:34 am Top  

Ford-Rangers.com Ranger Forum > Ranger Engine Tech > 8 Cylinder Gasoline > Concept SVE ranger

Users viewing this topic



PHP Version: 8.2.28
Server version: 10.6.21-MariaDB
UltraBB 2.01.01 Copyright © 2008-2025 Jim & Chris
Page processed in 0.0604 seconds (39% database + 61% PHP). 78 queries executed.