How reliable is the 4.0 SOHC engine for - 6 Cylinder Gasoline - Ranger Engine Tech

Home

Recent Topics

New posts

Not logged in - Login | Register

Ford-Rangers.com Ranger Forum > Ranger Engine Tech > 6 Cylinder Gasoline > How reliable is the 4.0 SOHC engine for

Ford-rangers.com is a discussion forum, a Ranger forum for people who have questions about fixing or modifying
their Ford Rangers or people who just admire their Ranger. Please join and enjoy sharing experiences!

How reliable is the 4.0 SOHC engine for #: 1613

Moderated by: Mike69, MaDMaXX,

New Topic

Rate Topic

Posted: Wed May 1st, 2019 06:42 pm

Quote

1^st Post

wh23g3g
Member

Joined: Sun Mar 11th, 2018

Location: Georgia USA

Posts: 130

Name:

Occupation:

Interests:

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 130

Member's Gallery

I'm looking to replace my 98 Ranger with another later Ranger since I can't afford the remake. Like a 2003+. I kinda wanted one with power windows, mirrors, and locks. So I have some features for the specific Ranger I want. I've got to have an extended cab with the rear jump seats even though they aren't likely to be used. I kinda was looking at the 4wd models since they tend to be more heavily optioned except the one I'm currently wanting to go take a closer look at. It's an 07 XL stripped down fleet truck. It's got the 4.0 SOHC and automatic. It is 4wd, non-limited slip. Plus it's manual everything and doesn't have the rear seats. It's got a little over 150,000 miles. But the price seems fair. I'm just wanting to know more about the 4.0 SOHC because it appears to be a quite complicated engine compared to the 3.0 and 4.0 OHV engines. We did have an 01 Explorer with the same 4.0 SOHC it was still running good at over 200,000 when we got rid of it. I remember the only repair was the thermostat housing that I know are notorious for leaking. I don't think we ever put a water pump or any ignition part on it other than plugs and wires. I see it has a timing chain on the front, a cam chain on the front and back. I've heard from various mechanics say that the guides start to break on high mileage and it's a good bit of money to do a timing set on it. I would be using the truck as a daily driver. But I only have a 5 minute commute back and forth everyday. I do drive a bit the two days I'm off but not always. I know the SOHC has more hp than the OHV 4.0 but not a huge difference in torque. So which is the best for reliability? Or do I need to look back to the 2000 model year as the last year of the 4.0 OHV?

____________________
1998 Ford Ranger XLT 2.5 4R44E Automatic 4.10 non-limited slip, 1993 Ford Ranger XLT 2.3 M5 Manual, 3.45 non-limited slip

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Wed May 1st, 2019 08:34 pm

Quote

2^nd Post

Tsquare
Member

Joined: Fri Nov 10th, 2017

Location: Suwanee, Georgia USA

Posts: 1540

Name:

Occupation: Controlled Insanity ...

Interests:

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 1540

Member's Gallery

Just as an FYI. A five minute commute does not allow the engine components to fully heat up. You will be at a higher risk of sludging up the engine.

I work 2.5 miles from where I live. On my trip home I make sure I take a 15 to 20 minute ride to get everything up to temperature.

I try to ride my motorcycle as much as possible.

____________________
Tony
NE ATL
'04 XLT regular cab 3.slo stepside
Semi retirement

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Wed May 1st, 2019 10:14 pm

Quote

3^rd Post

wh23g3g
Member

Joined: Sun Mar 11th, 2018

Location: Georgia USA

Posts: 130

Name:

Occupation:

Interests:

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 130

Member's Gallery

Well my drive home is usually the only time it's 5 minutes. It takes about 15 minutes to drive about 5 miles in the morning. By the time I get to work the temperature is at normal operating temperature. When I go to lunch it definitely gets warmed up enough, because I usually drive further. Depending on the time I go to lunch the truck is still warm by the time I get ready to leave. Anyway it's already got well over 200,000 miles on this engine. The whole truck has 391,000 miles on it so I'm trying to find a replacement Ranger with at least under 200,000 miles.

____________________
1998 Ford Ranger XLT 2.5 4R44E Automatic 4.10 non-limited slip, 1993 Ford Ranger XLT 2.3 M5 Manual, 3.45 non-limited slip

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Thu May 2nd, 2019 02:43 pm

Quote

4^th Post

JAMMAN

Owns A Torsen

Joined: Mon Sep 18th, 2017

Location: Grove City, Ohio USA

Posts: 6436

Name: Jim ...

Occupation: 5 axis cnc programmer ...

Interests: RBV's ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 6436

Member's Gallery

Isn't it great we can get a Ranger with 200,000 miles and still expect to have it a while? I love these trucks!

You could play it safe and get a 3.0. If all you are going to do is drive it then they are perfectly fine. 1 or 2 better in fuel mileage too.

The 4.0 SOHC is a decent motor but your mechanic is right about the guides on the excessive amount of timing chains.

In my opinion the 4.0 OHV is one of the greatest little motors ever made, why the decision was made to replace it with a multi-cam beast for minimal gain is beyond me and that plastic t-stat housing was a joke at best.

The only problem is a good non twisted minimal rust 98 thru 2000 is becoming harder to find by the month.

____________________
00 XLT 4WD RCSB 3.GO! JalapeÃ±o
01 XLT 2WD RC Steppie 3.0 auto Silver
The future belongs to those who show up.

Already liked - 1 like likes

410customs

Quote

Posted: Thu May 2nd, 2019 05:50 pm

Quote

5^th Post

wh23g3g
Member

Joined: Sun Mar 11th, 2018

Location: Georgia USA

Posts: 130

Name:

Occupation:

Interests:

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 130

Member's Gallery

Yeah I wanted 4.0 OHV because I know they are easier to work with. I had a 1992 that a 4.0 and it was fairly easy to do regular service and repairs on. The 3.0 probably too, but never had one. Although I hear from owners they are severely under powered in any Ranger. The 07 Ranger I'm thinking about going to check out is a stripped down XL. So I'm not sure it's going to be what I want. Plus it's from up North, which was why I wanted to check it out first to see how bad it is rusted underneath. I don't necessarily need a 4x4 in this area but they do seem to be the ones with all the options I'm looking for. I would be happy with a limited slip equipped Ranger but I haven't seen but one that wasn't a 4x4.

____________________
1998 Ford Ranger XLT 2.5 4R44E Automatic 4.10 non-limited slip, 1993 Ford Ranger XLT 2.3 M5 Manual, 3.45 non-limited slip

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Thu May 2nd, 2019 07:19 pm

Quote

6^th Post

black06xlt
Coal miner

Joined: Sat Nov 25th, 2017

Location: Flushing, Ohio USA

Posts: 1738

Name:

Occupation:

Interests: my wife my kids ford rangers ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 1738

Member's Gallery

The 4.0 ohv is a good little engine. The 4.0 sohc is also a good engine. The ohv is very dependable as is the sohc. The early sohc is prone to timing issues. But the sohc is the more powerful of the 2. The sohc has a higher rpm range and more bottom end power. However the ohv seems in my opinion to get better mpg's. If I was going to swap one for the other considering the time and money involved. I would go with a 5.0

____________________
1995 ranger splash (pieces)

Already liked - 1 like likes

410customs

Quote

Posted: Thu May 2nd, 2019 09:09 pm

Quote

7^th Post

Eddie Money
Member

Joined: Mon Nov 13th, 2017

Location: Pacific North West

Posts: 1587

Name:

Occupation:

Interests: Burt gummer life ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 1587

Member's Gallery

black06xlt wrote:
The 4.0 ohv is a good little engine. The 4.0 sohc is also a good engine. The ohv is very dependable as is the sohc. The early sohc is prone to timing issues. But the sohc is the more powerful of the 2. The sohc has a higher rpm range and more bottom end power. However the ohv seems in my opinion to get better mpg's. If I was going to swap one for the other considering the time and money involved. I would go with a 5.0
I agree 5.0L. I had rangers with both the OHV and SOHC. Both were great. 200k on the OHV before I sold it. 140k on the SOHC and still going, but soon to be a V8. SOHC is a bit more peppy than my OHV. The one thing about the SOHC is it has lots of plastic internals that can get brittle over time. I wouldnt reccomend swapping a high milage SOHC as a replacement. If you are going to pull your engine you are halfway to a V8 swap. Some members even claim better mpg afterwards.

____________________

I know my crazy! Do you?
2007 Sport 4door 4x4 4.0L SOHC V6 Ranger

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Fri May 3rd, 2019 10:05 am

Quote

8^th Post

black06xlt
Coal miner

Joined: Sat Nov 25th, 2017

Location: Flushing, Ohio USA

Posts: 1738

Name:

Occupation:

Interests: my wife my kids ford rangers ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 1738

Member's Gallery

Eddie Money wrote:
black06xlt wrote:

The 4.0 ohv is a good little engine. The 4.0 sohc is also a good engine. The ohv is very dependable as is the sohc. The early sohc is prone to timing issues. But the sohc is the more powerful of the 2. The sohc has a higher rpm range and more bottom end power. However the ohv seems in my opinion to get better mpg's. If I was going to swap one for the other considering the time and money involved. I would go with a 5.0
I agree 5.0L. I had rangers with both the OHV and SOHC. Both were great. 200k on the OHV before I sold it. 140k on the SOHC and still going, but soon to be a V8. SOHC is a bit more peppy than my OHV. The one thing about the SOHC is it has lots of plastic internals that can get brittle over time. I wouldnt reccomend swapping a high milage SOHC as a replacement. If you are going to pull your engine you are halfway to a V8 swap. Some members even claim better mpg afterwards.
I had a v8 expo that got the same mileage as my 4.0. To me it seemed the 5.0 had more down low but the 4.0 had more top end. But keep in mind it was a factory 5.0. It shifted right when it was making good power

____________________
1995 ranger splash (pieces)

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Sun May 5th, 2019 07:14 am

Quote

9^th Post

Mike69

Mustang Nut

Joined: Sun Oct 22nd, 2017

Location: Horsepasture, USA

Posts: 1692

Name: Mike ...

Occupation: Semi-retired ...

Interests: Vintage Mustangs, RBV's, car shows, & woodworking ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 1692

Member's Gallery

My wife had a 99 Explorer Sport which we purchased new w/the 4.0 SOHC & when we sold it the engine had 275K miles on it, her current 99 Sport has 105K miles on it.

____________________
21 Bronco Sport Big Bend (Wife's DD)
05 F150 XLT Reg Cab, 2WD, 5.4L, Auto (My DD)
69 Mustang Coupe 5.0, 5 spd 9" rear(Project)
14 Kawasaki Vulcan (Wife's Toy)

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Sat Aug 24th, 2019 01:28 am

Quote

10^th Post

ShovelheadKevin
Shovelhead Kevin

Joined: Sun Dec 10th, 2017

Location: Chestnut Mtn., Georgia USA

Posts: 158

Name:

Occupation:

Interests: The 3 Rs: Reading, racing & relatives. ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 158

Member's Gallery

My 98 XLT 4.0 4x4 has 146K on the clock and still as reliable as when left showroom. I'd have no doubts about a road trip to Las Vegas {I'm in NE Ga...} and back as for reliability.
Bottom line is how well the maintenance has been. You can have one w/75K and if it was treated shabby it will prolly let you know...and usually at the worst moment.
As for everyone wanting to go 5.0, y'all go ahead. Me? I'm happy with Little Red just as she is. ;)

____________________
The good we do is never remembered, the bad...never forgotten.
1998 4.0 XLT ExtCab 4x4 {lil Red/Mine}
2005 Honda Civic {Hers/Ours/Spare}
2015 Hyundai Accent {Hers}
1980 80" Harley FXLR Custom {ALL mine!}

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Sat Aug 24th, 2019 09:20 pm

Quote

11^th Post

Arthur
Member

Joined: Sat Apr 13th, 2019

Location: Canada

Posts: 117

Name:

Occupation:

Interests:

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 117

Member's Gallery

184K on original motor and still runs strong and QUIET(sometimes I forget it's running), doesn't burn oil, no timing noises, no vibrations, no leaks. Me happy.

Changed the plugs, wires and filter when I bought it.

____________________
2008 XLT 4x4 4.0 5Spd. Pretty much stock except 33's and Bilsteins: A bit broken for now.
2007 FX4 Level II auto: new project!

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Sun Aug 25th, 2019 10:07 am

Quote

12^th Post

410customs

Idahome

Joined: Wed May 2nd, 2018

Location: Panhandle, Idaho USA

Posts: 2165

Name: Jamie ...

Occupation: Elevator Design Worlds Tallest Buildings ...

Interests: Ranger Based Vehicles and OFFROAD ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 2165

Member's Gallery

I have been seeing more and more 2004+ trucks with the SOHC engine and over 300K miles
The SOHC is a good engine, I have never seen one blow itself apart other then the timing guides and chains.
if you change your oil and prevent them from getting hot they can last a good long time.
However finding a sohc with over 150K miles on it is a crapshoot unless you know the engines history....

____________________
I build custom RBV, specializing in drivetrain conversions, wiring, suspension and complete custom trucks

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Wed Dec 11th, 2019 11:16 pm

Quote

13^th Post

deeretrax
Member

Joined: Sun Sep 1st, 2019

Location:

Posts: 11

Name:

Occupation:

Interests:

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 11

Member's Gallery

My 2002 currently has 495K original miles. I'm going for 500k before I pull it and rebuild. Got it almost new with 80 miles on it. Have run synthetic since day one. Still my daily driver.

Already liked - 1 like likes

Eddie Money

Quote

Posted: Thu Dec 12th, 2019 01:44 pm

Quote

14^th Post

410customs

Idahome

Joined: Wed May 2nd, 2018

Location: Panhandle, Idaho USA

Posts: 2165

Name: Jamie ...

Occupation: Elevator Design Worlds Tallest Buildings ...

Interests: Ranger Based Vehicles and OFFROAD ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 2165

Member's Gallery

SOHC engine must have synthetic and they must have regular oil changes, this keeps the tensioners and guides happy so the engine will live longer....like 500K miles type of longer.
Fun Fact, I have never seen a sohc engine fail in the bottom end, the bottom end is like bombproof. It is ONLY the timing and components that lead to early life ending problems on these engines.... avoid the 97-99 engines. I personally really like the 04+ sohcs, they are awesome IF YOU TAKE CARE OF THEM

____________________
I build custom RBV, specializing in drivetrain conversions, wiring, suspension and complete custom trucks

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Thu Dec 12th, 2019 10:42 pm

Quote

15^th Post

4.0power
Member

Joined: Sun Nov 5th, 2017

Location: USA

Posts: 496

Name:

Occupation:

Interests:

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 496

Member's Gallery

410customs wrote:
SOHC engine must have synthetic and they must have regular oil changes, this keeps the tensioners and guides happy so the engine will live longer....like 500K miles type of longer.
Fun Fact, I have never seen a sohc engine fail in the bottom end, the bottom end is like bombproof. It is ONLY the timing and components that lead to early life ending problems on these engines.... avoid the 97-99 engines. I personally really like the 04+ sohcs, they are awesome IF YOU TAKE CARE OF THEM
Amen! Mine gotten synthetic since I got 156k and doesn't miss a beat. I've also been a bit mean to it as well (burnouts, â€œtop speedâ€ runs, heavy trailers lol)

____________________
2002 xlt 4.0 5r55e 4x4 4.10 rear disc brake swap from sn95 **currently swapping in a 5.0***
2003 2.3 2wd 5 speed single cab dropped 9 inches looks like crap rides like crap but for some reason itâ€™s cool to me
2004 gmc 2500hd 6.6 diesel LLY
1989 foxbody 347 stroker t5 trans

Already liked -

Quote

Posted: Fri Dec 13th, 2019 05:30 pm

Quote

16^th Post

Mike69

Mustang Nut

Joined: Sun Oct 22nd, 2017

Location: Horsepasture, USA

Posts: 1692

Name: Mike ...

Occupation: Semi-retired ...

Interests: Vintage Mustangs, RBV's, car shows, & woodworking ...

Status:

Offline

Reputation:

Reputation Points: 1692

Member's Gallery

The last 99 Sport we had with the 4.0 SOHC that we purchased brand new we ran it to 275K miles before we sold it with me doing all the maintenance on it.

____________________
21 Bronco Sport Big Bend (Wife's DD)
05 F150 XLT Reg Cab, 2WD, 5.4L, Auto (My DD)
69 Mustang Coupe 5.0, 5 spd 9" rear(Project)
14 Kawasaki Vulcan (Wife's Toy)

Already liked -

Quote

Current time is 05:12 am	Top
Ford-Rangers.com Ranger Forum > Ranger Engine Tech > 6 Cylinder Gasoline > How reliable is the 4.0 SOHC engine for
Users viewing this topic

PHP Version: 8.2.28

Server version: 10.6.22-MariaDB