1
View single post by MaDMaXX | |||||||||
Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017 03:50 pm |
|
||||||||
MaDMaXX Hails from the land of rust! ![]() Joined: Sat Oct 21st, 2017
Posts: 1368
Status:
Offline
Reputation: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Reputation Points: $user_rep
![]() |
Thanks, Under. So, i understand the centric part and as i said earlier, i have felt the wheels "locate" when tightening them down, i have to assume that all load bearing responsibility on the Rangers with stock wheels, is on the studs? This being the case, whilst the hug is there and relatively tight to the stock wheels at least, there is no load on it? I asked earlier if we knew the centricity was purely stud/lug based, or if it was both: 1) Lug centric for rotational purposes only? 2) Hub centric for load? 3) Both? 4) Lug centric for load completely? I don't want to end up with a mess on my hands (nor would anyone) So at this point, i either need to know for sure what i need to care about re centricity, or what i don't need to care about :) I also think i might have a stud length issue to grind off :( 1.25 inch studs and unlikely i have a quarter inch hollow in the stock steel wheels to accept that after 1 inch spacers are affixed.
____________________ 2002 - 3.0 - 4x2 - Edge Upgrades/Maintenance log |
||||||||
|