1
View single post by Tsquare | |||||||||
Posted: Sun Jun 3rd, 2018 09:01 am |
|
||||||||
Tsquare![]() Joined: Fri Nov 10th, 2017
Posts: 1540
Status:
Offline
Reputation: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Reputation Points: $user_rep
![]() |
Undrstm8ed wrote:Tsquare wrote: That may be stretching it but there might have been. The truck was on a dyno in a climate controlled room with a couple of fans pointed at the front of the truck. I not sure there was much of a ram air action but the air going into the airbox was coming from outside the engine compartment. My tuner tried the various intakes but also tried a couple of different cat-back exhaust to get the combination that worked best together. The addition of one component usually had little effect. The combination of a freer flowing intake, freer flowing exhaust, electric fans, electric water pump, under-drive pulley, and tune chip allowed more torque to the rear tires. In real world driving the truck went from 13.5 mpg to 15-15.5mpg in city driving and 16ish mpg hwy to 20mpg with a noticeable difference in my seat of the pants dynometer.
____________________ Tony NE ATL '04 XLT regular cab 3.slo stepside Semi retirement |
||||||||
|